Paul, Minn.-based NaviLogic, a Cylance partner, said the Sophos test was "not the same level of performance that we've seen" with the product. "Believe the math!"īill Strub, co-founder of St. "Once again, we stress to you the utmost importance of not trusting ANY vendor's claims (including Cylance) and TO TEST FOR YOURSELVES," the planned Cylance blog post said. Sophos did not provide additional comment to CRN beyond the blog post. He said Sophos found those claims to be untrue. Schiappa also slammed Cylance's claims to work without being connected to the Internet and doesn't require prior knowledge of specific malware. "If we look at the scorecard for the 'Nasty Nine,' it should make anyone think twice about considering Cylance Protect for endpoint security." "No matter what kind of exploit we threw at it, whether it's a new threat or a nasty ransomware sample, Cylance Protect continues to struggle while Sophos simply protects," Schiappa said. When run against nine different types of malware, Schiappa said, Sophos matched Cylance on one category (executable malware), beat the company's solution in three (MS Office files, PDFs, JavaScript) and stopped malware Cylance failed to stop in five categories (Malicious URLs, Phishing, Unauthorized Apps, Removable Media and exploits). He said both companies did a "good job" stopping executable malware, but said Cylance has been known to "slant the playing field to make sure their product looks good" in competitive comparisons. For example, the company ran 100 different types of executable malware against Cylance Protect and Sophos on different machines. Schiappa said Sophos tested its technology against Cylance among different categories of malware. Like Sophos, Cylance is 100 percent channel and has seen growing momentum with partners in the endpoint security market. The company has seen 1,089 percent product billings growth and 785 percent customer growth since it started in 2012. In December, Symantec also wrote a blog post about the company, comparing the two technologies and criticizing the startup.Ĭylance has been on a growth tear recently, most recently landing $100 million in Series D funding in June. Sophos isn't the only major endpoint security vendor to slam Cylance. The next time you hear Cylance or any other next-gen endpoint company talk about their protection, make sure you do your own research," Schiappa said. "By adding Cylance to an equation, an IT organization is getting less protection and more false positives and a lot more expense. In a blog post Thursday, Kendra Krause, Sophos vice president of global channels, highlighted a recent presentation by Dan Schiappa, senior vice president and general manager of the End User Security Group, in which the executive said Cylance and other next-gen endpoint players have made some "bold statements" about their technology, but claimed that partners and customers are ultimately ending up with less protection for a higher cost. The fight is on in the endpoint security market, and Sophos is the latest vendor to throw punches at next-generation endpoint security startup Cylance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |